B-ENT

Test-retest reliability of the Dutch version of the Dizziness Handicap Inventory

1.

Division of Neuro- and Psychomotor Physical Therapy, Department of Health Care, University College Antwerpen, Van Aertselaerstraat 31, 2170 Merksem, Belgium

2.

Vestibular Function Laboratory, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Antwerp University Hospital, Wilrijkstraat 10, 2650 Edegem, Belgium

3.

Department of Health Care, University College Antwerpen, Van Aertselaerstraat 31, 2170 Merksem (Antwerpen), Belgium

4.

Faculty of Science (Department of Biomedical Physics), University of Antwerp, Groenenborgerlaan 171, 2020 Antwerpen, Belgium

5.

University deptartment ENT, Antwerp University Hospital, University of Antwerp

B-ENT 2006; 2: 75-80
Read: 937 Downloads: 744 Published: 22 February 2020

Test-retest reliability of the Dutch version of the Dizziness Handicap Inventory. In the last fifteen years the Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI) has gained wide acceptance as a useful measure of handicap resulting from dizziness and unsteadiness. The objective of this study was to calculate measurement error and test-retest reliability of the Dutch version of the DHI. The translation into Dutch was performed according to a double translation method. One hundred and six patients with balance problems (range 26-78 years), scheduled for vestibular rehabilitation, completed the DHI on two occasions on the same day. The test-retest reliability was excellent, with Intraclass Correlation Coefficients ranging from 0.94 to 0.99 for DHI sub-scores and DHI total score. Most weighted kappa values (kW) exceeded 0.80 indicating substantial item per item test-retest reliability. Over 80% agreement was noted for all items except for item 8 (74%). Item 8 asks whether the subject feels dizzy or unsteady while doing ambitious activities like sports, dancing and household activities. Consequently measurement errors were calculated, suggesting that, after an intervention, the pretreatment DHI total score should at least decrease with 12 points (lower bound 99% confidence interval for a true change) before the intervention could be said to be effective for an individual patient. Based on these data, the Dutch version of the DHI showed itself to be a highly reliable instrument to assess the self-perceived handicap imposed by vestibular system diseases.

Files
EISSN 2684-4907