B-ENT

Injudicious use of EBM: one step forward, two steps back

1.

Department of Otolaryngology – Head & Neck Surgery, Central Military Hospital ‘Dr. A. Mathijsen’, Utrecht, The Netherlands

2.

Gelre Ziekenhuizen, Apeldoorn

3.

Department of Otolaryngology, Amphia Hospital, Langendijk 75, Breda

B-ENT 2014; 10: 245-249
Read: 923 Downloads: 729 Published: 04 February 2020

Injudicious use of EBM: one step forward, two steps back. Problem: The authors are concerned that an overrestrictive approach to evidence-based medicine could lead to the neglect of valuable treatment options.

Methodology: We describe the need for a personalised approach to evidence-based medicine and support this with examples from ENT practice.

Results: We concur with the point of view that evidence at all levels should be used in clinical decision-making and we suggest that fitness for purpose is more important than hierarchy of evidence.

Conclusion: We conclude that the application of evidence-based medicine should involve trying to select the best therapy for individuals on the basis of the total spectrum of treatment options. Evidence and expertise should work synergistically.

Files
EISSN 2684-4907